[Irene-Amelia.com previews the forensic analysis, documentary,
and MSS Protecting
Earhart. [Protecting Earhart U.S. Copyright Office
Registration Numbers: TXu 1-915-926; TXu 2-061-539]
|Amelia under the nose of her Lockheed Electra 10E, 1937
|Amelia Earhart, 1937
|...superimposed shows the obvious congruence...
|...to the Gervais-Irene Bolam in 1965
The True Story of Amelia Earhart
By Tod Swindell
Consider how easy it would have been at any time for the United States justice department to have proved
this story untrue, if in fact, it was untrue. To look into the past of any person's Twentieth Century life history in the
United States in order to determine who that person really was in a life-long way, should ordinarily be easy for a United
States official to do.
It also speaks for itself that the controversial debate over
Amelia Earhart's continued existence in the United States as 'Irene' after World War Two continued to exist for nearly fifty
years with no official resolve. One might think the Smithsonian would have wanted to put an end to it. Or Amelia's
The realization was they didn't, because they couldn't, and there
were and still are some important reasons for that. The new exception is, when the profound reality of Amelia Earhart suddenly
starts staring back at the world in no uncertain terms, it's time to pay attention to it.
This universal truth is now plain as day obvious: It is known what became of Amelia Earhart after July 2,
1937, because in recent years applications of forensic science solidly proved it.
Here, to answer the question of why the general public was left in the dark about Amelia's true fate, one
might consider the following quote from Marylin Bender and Selig Altschul's 1982 voluminous Pan Am Airways anthology, The
Chosen Instrument: "Numerous investigations foundered on official silence in Tokyo and Washington, leaving the true
fate of Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan an everlasting mystery."
The vast majority
of people who deeply studied the subject of their disappearance, commonly recognized how amid reparation agreements struck
between the United States and Japan after VJ Day, the door was slammed tight on what really happened to Amelia Earhart and
Fred Noonan on and after July 2, 1937, and it was left that way ever since.
If you have never heard the incredible true-story about Joe Gervais and Irene Bolam before, it is because
it has never been told in an easy to understand way. Really, I am the first person to do so.
I first met and came to know Joe Gervais and his wife, Thelma in 1996 at their Las Vegas home, and Joe and
I remained good friends and collaborators from then on, until his passing in 2005. Anymore it is certain, the truths you are
about to read have remained unaddressed by the United States justice department ever since the tip of the 'Earhart reality
iceberg' Joe Gervais discovered, first surfaced in 1970.
People have said,
people have written, and some people still do say and write that Joe Gervais was crazy to always adhere to the self-propelled
certainty he claimed to have discovered about Amelia Earhart's ultimate fate. In the past twenty years I have also seen myself
called 'crazy' in both spoken and written ways. Trust knowing, I exist today among the sanest Amelia Earhart historians on
the planet. This statement does not decry other formidable Amelia Earhart historians. It just leaves them deficient within
the Earhart truth arena, because, evidently, I proved to be the only one to finally make sense of it all, and then to exhibit
the self-assurance needed to stand-up and say it was justifiable for Joe Gervais to claim he solved the missing person
case of Amelia Earhart in 1970, by way of producing her body evidence in a public way.
This is so where people missed how important Joe Gervais' declaration was back then, and where people still
miss how important it is today.
Or, put it this way: The bell that Joe Gervais rang back then,
by way of the clear photograph he took of the former Amelia Earhart in 1965 that was widely published in 1970, went on to
prove itself impossible to unring. Many individuals have tried to un-ring it over the years, but they couldn't do it.
In today's world one cannot easily hide or disguise a true corpus delicti, nor
can one justifiably claim that a person's body isn't what it naturally evidences itself to be.
It is also interesting to note how all the while, on record,
not one official United States historian ever expressed a certain opinion toward the belief Joe Gervais
maintained the last forty years of his life. Basically, on any official level, his assertion was perpetually met by deflections
or avoided entirely.
And here it is. Brace yourself, because you're about to learn
the truth about what really became of Amelia Earhart after July 2, 1937. No, she did not disappear. People don't do that.
She also did not continue to fly around aimlessly after missing Howland Island until her plane ran out of gas, thus causing
her to crash and sink into the ocean. She and Fred Noonan were a lot smarter than that. Rest assured as well, Japan's military
never put them in front of a firing squad, and their bodies were not eaten by giant crabs on Nikumaroro.
Ladies and gentlemen, it's time to get real... about Amelia Earhart.
Summer of 65'
In the summer of 1965, at a gathering of mostly retired, all
be them, highly respected pilots in New York, a former air force captain who had flown planes in World War Two, Korea, and
Vietnam met and believed he recognized the woman who used to be known as Amelia Earhart. The man was Joseph A. Gervais, and
after deeply studying the woman's background for the next five years, he ascertained his belief about her was correct, and
surfaced his realization to a national news level in 1970.
His deduction was well founded, but Joe Gervais underestimated the power of the long-withheld truth he discovered.
Back then, one didn't just call out the still-living, 'identity cloaked' Amelia Earhart.
As things went, desiring to continue with the privacy she had sought and coveted for herself after the World
War Two years, and for what she considered to be historically prudent reasons as well, the former Amelia Earhart refuted the
assertion Joe Gervais made about her. Except the controversy over who she really was, or used to be, never went away, even
after she died in 1982, and into the new millennium. Consider that too, once again; in 2015, fifty years after Joe Gervais
met and photographed Mrs. Bolam, many people were still wondering who she really was, or used to be, because no person or
entity had ever 'officially' put an end to the debate over her true identity.
with it in 1997, Protecting Earhart's long-term forensic comparison analysis that was designed to determine if Joe
Gervais' decades-old assertion about the woman was or wasn't correct, proved in no uncertain terms that it was correct. World
academia is just now starting to catch up to this newfound historical reality. The elder looking, wings-adorned woman featured
in the photograph above, shown in her true eightieth year, definitely did used to be known as Amelia Earhart.
Not convinced? Well then, there is much to learn about this story, foremost to include how over the years
there have been well meaning people 'in the know about it' who preferred the general public not pay attention to the true
story of Amelia Earhart's world-flight outcome, for what they as well believed to be prudent historical reasons.
For years these people were legion in the United States, Japan,
and England, and to a certain extent their past preferences are still being honored today. It is plain enough that a kind
of high-level post-war pact between the three countries mentioned here, had long been dedicated to steering the veracity of
what actually happened to Amelia Earhart in 1937 away from being publicly recognized and accepted. The only real hiccup along
the way was the assertion of Major Gervais that became a national news item in 1970. When the story of his incredible proclamation
broke, though, siding with the former Amelia Earhart's wishes, her ongoing name-changed existence just seemed too
The new caveat
involves forensic truths that surfaced in the last twenty years by way of Protecting Earhart's efforts that were dedicated
to proving the story either way, before they ended up revealing the profound universal truths that they did. The website,
Irene-Amelia.com features a good sampling of Protecting Earhart's younger-to-older superimposed photographs that display
the woman who in the 1920s and 1930s was famously known as Amelia Earhart, along with her later-life self.
Love her unconditionally, because finally, ready or not, Amelia
Earhart is coming home.
(The story continues below the following images and statements.)
|1937 & 1965
| The Gervais-Irene Bolam
|Photograph taken by Joe Gervais, August 8, 1965
Setting the record straight: Faces,
head sizes, necks, shoulders, arm lengths, hands, heights, foot sizes, handwriting, voices, even friends and relatives and
locations frequented... all aligned to display their own truth-telling congruence. Not to leave out the Gervais-Irene Bolam
appeared nowhere as 'Irene' prior to the mid-1940s. Protecting Earhart's physical and character traits analysis proved
the forensic certainty of there having been three Twentieth Century women attributed to the same Irene Craigmile Bolam
identity, and one of them, the Gervais-Irene, was previously known as Amelia Earhart. Granted, for decades Amelia's extended
living relatives and individuals at the Smithsonian Institution have traditionally adhered to the practice of encouraging
the public to dismiss the Irene-Amelia reality out of hand. It is still the truth, none-the-less.
|The Gervais-Irene Bolam
|Newspaper photo, Mrs. Bolam in Japan, 1963
|Amelia photo added
|Photo from after the Friendship flight
"Special recognition goes to Tod Swindell,
who undertook an extensive, in-depth forensic analysis of the Gervais-Irene Bolam and Amelia Earhart to show the world
they were one in the same person." USAF Colonel, Rollin C. Reineck, reprinted from the Preface of his 2004 book, Amelia
Note: My late friend, USAF Colonel Rollin C. Reineck, included these kind words in his
book after we spent a few years collaborating to unravel the 'Amelia became Irene' truth, the origin of which stemmed from
Joe Gervais and author, Joe Klaas, who originally introduced the postulation of Amelia's continued survival as 'Irene' in
their 1970 book, Amelia Earhart Lives. After I commenced with my study in 1997, Colonel Reineck recognized how important
the realization was of a serious forensic analysis never having been done before, that compared the highly enigmatic, Irene
Bolam to Amelia Earhart. I was inspired to do one after the odd controversy over Mrs. Bolam was somewhat rejuvenated in 1994
by way of another common friend, Randall Brink, and his ground-shaking expose' book, Lost Star: The Search For Amelia Earhart.
Today, only Randall and I remain, and both of us are greatly indebted to the magnanimous efforts of the researchers that sided
with Joe Gervais, mostly World War Two heroes, whose efforts preceded our own. Thanks to them, it is now easy to identify
how three different women were attributed to the same 'Irene Craigmile Bolam' identity in the Twentieth Century, and one of
them had been previously known as Amelia Earhart. Tod Swindell, 2018
About The 1970 Book, Amelia Earhart Lives By Joe Klaas
is the book that started it all, Amelia Earhart Lives. Chocked with some
far-out suppositions within its attempt to explain what happened to Amelia and Fred Noonan in 1937, the book did manage to
feature the same 1965 photograph of the former Amelia Earhart identified as "Mrs. Irene Bolam" that was taken by
Joseph A. Gervais when the two met each other. Following the book's release it was ceaselessly ridiculed after the former
Amelia Earhart negated it for her own good reasons. Fortunately for her, many people who looked at the Gervais' photograph
had a hard time seeing through to who she used to be. She did look different, but she was still there, and she still is there.
The forensic tale-of-the-tape proved it out. As mentioned, once the bell-ring of the photo's inclusion in the book took place,
nothing could un-ring it. World War Two hero, Joseph Gervais always knew this, and he never stopped casually repeating it
to others to his dying day in 2005.
|Based on the research findings of Joe Gervais...
|'Amelia Earhart Lives' by Joe klaas. Published by McGraw-Hill, November 1970
|The Gervais-Irene and Guy Bolam
|From the 1970 book, 'Amelia Earhart Lives' by Joe Klaas
| The Gervais-Irene Bolam
|August 8, 1965
|Hard to believe but true...
|...Joe Gervais' camera did not lie
The True Story of Amelia Earhart (continued...)
When Joe Gervais met Mrs. Bolam and her English husband, Guy in 1965, he was introduced
to them by Viola Gentry, a good pilot-friend of Amelia's in the 1930s. Viola had asked Joe to come to New York and lecture
to her club of pilot friends about the previous years of research he had done on Amelia Earhart's disappearance.
Viola appeared surprised when Mrs. Bolam showed up at the luncheon where Joe was to lecture. Somewhat
flustered himself, Joe noticed an 'air of importance' about Mrs. Bolam, beyond feeling that he recognized her for who she
used to be. After asking Viola to introduce him to her, Joe cautiously asked Mrs. Bolam if she ever knew Amelia Earhart? She
to him that she had 'known Amelia Earhart well' and that she had 'often flown with her.' He
asked if she would be willing to meet him again and she said 'yes' and gave him her business card that listed her name as
'Irene Craigmile' on it. That had been her name before she married Guy Bolam in 1958.
It turned out, Irene Craigmile was a real person who did know Amelia Earhart in the 1930s. Born
Irene O'Crowley to Richard Joseph O'Crowley and his wife, Bridget Doyle O'Crowley, she was mostly raised by her maternal and
paternal extended families. She became Irene Craigmile in 1927, when she married Charles Craigmile, a civil engineer from
Below: The original Irene Craigmile, 1930
Shown between her husband, Charles Craigmile,
and her father, Richard Joseph O'Crowley
Craigmile tragically died in 1931. The following year, just a few months after Amelia became the first woman to fly solo
across the Atlantic, the Akron Beacon Journal of Ohio published a group photograph displaying both Amelia Earhart and the
recently widowed, Irene Craigmile within it. The two were shown among a group of women aviators visiting the hospitalized
pilot, Louise Thaden there:
|The Akron Beacon Journal, September 1, 1932
Above: Amelia Earhart outlined in white, Irene
Craigmile outlined in black.
Above: 'Irene Craigmile' is listed after Viola Gentry
Above: After Amelia married George Putnam in 1931, for a short while
she took his name, as shown here
|A true photo enlargement obliterates...
|...Irene Craigmile between pilots Viola Gentry and Edith Foltz
More about the Original Irene Craigmile
When the above newspaper
photograph was taken, the recently widowed, Irene Craigmile was not-yet a licensed pilot. She began taking flying lessons
in the fall of 1932, after Amelia and Viola Gentry helped sign her up at Floyd Bennet Field on Long Island. She learned
to fly there and at Roosevelt Field, and received her pilot's license in late May of 1933. Except soon after she did, she
realized she was pregnant with her last flight instructor, Alvin Heller's child. The two eloped to be married that August,
son, Clarence Alvin 'Larry' Heller was born in early March of 1934.
Before she realized she was pregnant in 1933, the original
Irene Craigmile had barely logged any solo-piloting hours, and she was never known to fly a plane again.
From there the trail
of the original Irene Craigmile grows cold. Clear, legible photographs of her no longer exist, and it is hard to know what
ultimately became of her. A sketchy record remains, including how her marriage to Alvin Heller was legally annulled by the
end of the 1930s. Their son, Larry Heller, grew up to become a Pan Am pilot and resides in Florida today, but it is highly
questionable if he ever knew his biological mother, the original Irene Craigmile. A likely scenario may have been that something
happened to her, perhaps a debilitating illness as a result of a childbirth complication(?) that was later covered over.
In any case, Larry Heller did have a mother figure growing up as a child, but who she actually was remains a subject of debate.
She did not look like Amelia Earhart, to be sure, and appeared to be about a generation younger than she should have been.
Take a look:
Left and right: In 2006, and again in
writing in 2014, Clarence Heller, the son of the original Irene Craigmile, positively identified this woman to have been his
late mother in both younger and older forms. He provided the esitmated dates applied to each photo as well. She did not look
like Amelia Earhart.
This woman shown in younger and older
forms, was identified as "Irene Craigmile" in 1946 on the left, of the People's National Bank of Long Island's Mineola
Branch. On the right the same person is seen again in 1965, in the picture Joe Gervais took after she became known as, "Mrs.
Irene Bolam" in 1958. This particular Irene was identified nowhere as Irene prior to the mid 1940s, even though she was
legally attributed to the exact same identity vectors of Larry Heller's mother. For the sake of distinguishing the different
Irene's from each other, Protecting Earhart labeled this one, "the Gervais-Irene." Overcoming decades of
ridicule and cynical scrutiny, today and any further it stands to reason; there is no doubt this particular Irene Bolam used
to be known as Amelia Earhart.
Neither one of the two different Irene
Craigmiles displayed above appeared to resemble the original Irene Craigmile displayed in the grainy photo below. Born in
1904, no clear, distinguishable photo images of the original Irene Craigmile from prior to the 1940s have ever been located.
Even her son, Larry Heller attested he didn't have any photos of his mother pre-dating the 1940s. This includes family group
photos, wedding pictures, school class pictures, or any other photos.
|The original 'real' Irene, 1930
Once again, add all of the above knowledge,
of course, to how the Irene Craigmile Bolam who Joe Gervais photographed in 1965, appears nowhere identified as 'Irene' prior
to the mid-1940s.
Let me repeat that: The Irene Craigmile Bolam who Joe Gervais photographed in 1965, appears nowhere identified
as 'Irene' prior to the mid-1940s.
This leaves one logical
deduction based of forensic evidence reasoning: Where the Irene Craigmile Bolam who Joe Gervais photographed in 1965 appears anywhere
prior to the mid-1940s, she does so identified as 'Amelia Earhart.'
Evidence: "That suitable for argumentation in a court of law."]
About the Original Irene Craigmile's O'Crowley
As the story goes, the original Irene Craigmile's mother, Bridget nee-Doyle O'Crowley,
died in 1917 when her only child, Irene, was twelve. Before Bridget died, census records show she had been raising her daughter,
Irene, alone with her Doyle parents in New Jersey. After Bridget died, from that point on census records show Irene being
further raised by her father, Richard's family, most specifically by her father's sister, an attorney by the name of Irene
Rutherford O'Crowley, and their mother, Sarah, in Newark, New Jersey. [Note: Protecting Earhart's MSS includes a
detail of the O'Crowley family lineage and life events. The O'Crowleys were a prominent New Jersey family.]
How Amelia Earhart Was Able To Become Irene
Amelia Earhart was a good friend of the original Irene Craigmile's aunt, the Attorney, Irene Rutherford
O'Crowley who practiced law in New Jersey and New York. Amelia's former flying pal, Viola Gentry, who introduced Joe Gervais
to the former Amelia Earhart and her husband, Guy Bolam in 1965, later told him this was how Amelia originally came to 'know'
Irene Craigmile, through Irene's attorney aunt who had been Amelia's friend, and a fellow ZONTA member with her as well.
The ZONTA organization,
founded in Buffalo, New York in 1919, was and still is an international organization of professional women. Amelia joined
ZONTA after she became famous in 1928, and was soon befriended by two of its more prominent members, Nina Broderick Price
of England, and Attorney Irene Rutherford O'Crowley of Newark, New Jersey, who as mentioned, was the original Irene Craigmile's
aunt, and whose older brother, Richard Joseph O'Crowley, was the original Irene Craigmile's father.
Nina Price and Attorney
Irene O'Crowley were good friends and ZONTA chapter presidents who had helped launch the Amelia Earhart brand products line
in the early to mid-1930s. Nina was a flamboyant publicist and dress designer who helped Amelia in those areas, and Attorney
Irene worked on the legal contracts side that helped to establish the Amelia Earhart brand luggage-line based in Newark, something
she continued to be involved with into the 1960s.
Today the ZONTA's still award Amelia Earhart Scholarships to aspiring young
How And When The Amelia To Irene Change Took Place
It appears evident enough how at some point during the
World War Two years, Attorney Irene Rutherford O'Crowley cooperated with the U.S. justice department and one Monsignor James
Francis Kelley of Rumson, New Jersey, with an arrangement for Amelia to be able to assume the still-extant identity of Attorney
Irene's niece, Irene Craigmile for Amelia to use after the war years.
Monsignor Kelley was the president of Seton Hall College
at the time the war ended, and he helped Amelia become the new Irene Craigmile after her return to the United States,
and he served, as he later described it, as her "emotional healing therapist" while doing so. [Monsignor Kelley
held doctorate degrees in psychology and philosophy.]
From the 1970s into the 1990s, Monsignor Kelley explained facets of this incredible
truth to a variety of different people who later went on record describing what he had told them. In 1991, five years before
he died, in a recorded interview, Monsignor Kelley himself confirmed his past long-time friend, the late Irene Bolam, used
to be known as Amelia Earhart. People who disagreed with Father Kelley's conveyance claimed later-life 'senility' must have
caused him to make up the things he said about his good friend, Irene having been previously known as Amelia Earhart. Those
who he spoke to about it, though, insisted he was lucid while doing so, and the forensic analysis itself later revealed he
had not made it up at all.
Amelia's Life As Irene
After she became Irene, Amelia was never known to pilot a plane again. She
was given various positions in the banking industry on Long Island after the war, until she married Guy Bolam. She became
a ZONTA member again as 'Irene Craigmile' and served as president of the Long Island ZONTA chapter in the 1950s. After she
married Guy Bolam, the two traveled abroad frequently until Guy died in 1970. Through Guy's enterprise, Radio Luxembourg
in Europe, that she became president of herself after Guy died, it can be said the former Amelia Earhart was part of the
same radio station that helped introduce the Beatles to Soviet Russia in the 1960s. She also knew a few NASA astronauts,
and "2001: A Space Odyssey" had been a favorite movie of hers.
After Major Gervais pegged Mrs. Bolam for who she used
to be in 1965, then tried to introduce it by way of the book, Amelia Earhart Lives in 1970, the former Amelia Earhart
sued the publisher of the book, McGraw-Hill, the book's author, Joe Klaas, and she sued Joe Gervais as well, whose research
material the book was largely based on. It's worth recalling here how in 1965, even though she had agreed to meet again with
Joe Gervais, she subsequently proved herself evasive and never did.
Her lawsuit reached the New York Supreme Court and lasted
five years. Mrs. Bolam's Attorney, Benedict Ginsberg, who had once worked for Robert F. Kennedy, sought one million dollars
in damages. Except Mrs. Bolam, who had not been involved in the book's writing process, did not sue the publisher and authors
for inferring she was the former Amelia Earhart. She sued them for libel. For instance, the book had referred to her late
husband, Guy, who had recently died, as her "alleged husband," when in fact they had been legally married.
McGraw-Hill ended up
remitting a high five-figure settlement to the former Amelia Earhart, and it removed the remaining copies of Amelia Earhart
Lives from the stores. [Author, Joe Klaas, estimated about forty-thousand copies of the book made it into circulation
before it was withdrawn, and it has since been republished.] In an interesting twist as well, she settled her differences
with Joe Gervais and Joe Klaas by way of the opposing parties swapping ten dollars of consideration, after she refused to
submit her fingerprints as proof-positive of her identity. She wasn't in want of money, after all, and after five years
most people had chalked-up the Gervais' assertion about her past to have been a hoax. It wasn't a hoax, but Mrs. Bolam wasn't
about to wreck the remaining years of her life by way of admitting who she used to be. So much explaining would have been
demanded if she had admitted it, not only from herself, but from a slew of prominent, high-level individuals.
former Amelia Earhart died seven years after her 'summary judgment' lawsuit ended. She had prearranged to donate her body
to Rutgers College of Medicine. According to the school when later contacted, she was cremated and interned in a common,
After she died, many people, including some who had been close to her in her later years, still continued
to suspect the late Mrs. Bolam used to be the famous pilot, Amelia Earhart. In a New Jersey newspaper article that appeared
a few months after her passing, even her son's wife, Joan Heller, was quoted to have said she and her husband were "no
longer sure" about the question of her past identity. As well, to myself in 2006, Clarence Heller admitted he held no
photos of his mother dated prior to the 1940s. And although Mr. Heller consistently denied over the years that his mother
was Amelia Earhart, he was merely telling the truth. Clarence Heller was legitimately born to Al and Irene Heller on March
The bottom line is, anymore it is absolutely certain that the ongoing suspicion about the late Gervais-Irene
Bolam's true past was justifiable, because it was true that she used to be known as, 'Amelia Earhart.'
this is the true story of what became of Amelia Earhart after July 2, 1937. Be that as it may, it is still unclear when it
comes to what really happened after she and Fred Noonan were declared 'missing.' It is widely assumed that within days after
the duo failed to locate Howland Island, Japan rescued them in the lower Marshall Islands where they had endured an emergency
The later added deducement that featured
Amelia's continued survival, states that right when Japan was about to declare war on China, she and Noonan strayed too far
north during their Plan-B attempt to reach the Gilbert Islands, and ended up in Japan's off-limits Marshall Islands instead.
There they were picked up and detained, and at least Amelia ended up remaining in Japan's custody until the end of World
While various aspects of the above descriptions
have been corroborated by different Amelia Earhart historians over the years, to explain why Amelia's Marshall Islands ditching
still remains an assumption today is academic: The only official record of Amelia's loss shows that she went
missing on July 2, 1937, and after not being found she was legally declared 'dead' in early January of 1939.
technically, where the July 2, 1937 Marshall Islands ditching assertion still remains an assumption, within the constraints
of it, to go along with Amelia's body evidence showing up as Irene Craigmile eight years later in the United States, what
really happened to her on that July 2, 1937 day, supplemented by where she ended up later, how she was treated, and how she
spent her days while she was gone... anymore exists as the 'real' mystery of Amelia Earhart.
It is safe to believe the former Amelia Earhart took much
of that information to her grave with her.
Today, all we really know for certain in a forensic reality way, is that
several years after Amelia Earhart went missing she managed to resurface in the United States as Irene Craigmile, and the
general public was never supposed to know about it.
Believe it or not, it's that simple.
Note: The above human congruence does not
exhibit a doppelganger-like coincidence. Head-to-toe and character trait wise, Protecting Earhart's forensic comparison
study merely displays the same human being in younger and older forms throughout it, whose birth name was "Amelia Mary
Earhart." She was born in Atchison, Kansas on July 24, 1897, and she died on July 7, 1982 in Edison, New Jersey known
as "Irene Bolam." Her father was "Samuel Stanton 'Edwin' Earhart," who was born in Atchison, Kansas, c.1867,
and who died in Los Angeles, California in 1930. Her mother was "Amelia Otis Earhart" who was born in Atchison,
Kansas in 1869, and who died in Medford, Massachusetts in 1962. Her sister was "Grace Muriel Earhart Morrissey"
who was born in Kansas City, Kansas on December 29, 1899, and who died on March 2, 1998 in Medford, Massachusetts.
Amelia's sister, Grace
Muriel Earhart Morrissey, was also a ZONTA member who did know her sister, Amelia in her later life years as 'Irene,'
although she never let-on who she used to be. She was known to admonish anyone who suggested her ZONTA friend, Irene was really
her sister sporting a different name, until she herself died in 1998.
Thank you, Tod
Swindell of Protecting Earhart, 2018
Once a world-famous pilot...
...the former Amelia Earhart