This website and the forensic research it presents is a copyrighted intellectual property. [U.S. Copyright registration #'s: TXu 1-915-926; 2014, TXu 2-061-539; 2017]
First asserted in
1970; forensically realized in the new millennium...
Truth About What Became Of Amelia Earhart After July 2, 1937
[Conclusion drawn from the final results of a long
term Forensic Research analysis and Forensic Comparison study.]
truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as
being self-evident." Arthur
'Forensic Truth Dissertation On What Became Of Amelia Earhart' begins under the following Irene-Amelia photographs
and their superimposed results.
Irene & Amelia superimposed
Mrs. Irene Craigmile Bolam, 1965 (FKA 'Amelia')
Photo credit: Joseph A. Gervais
Above: Amelia on the right
Irene & Amelia superimposed
Irene & Amelia superimposed
Mrs. Irene Craigmile Bolam, FKA "Amelia Earhart"
The Truth About What Became Of Amelia Earhart After July 2, 1937
A Two Part Dissertation By Tod Swindell
how easy it would have been at any time for the U.S. justice department to have proved this story untrue, if in fact, it was
To look into the past of any person's Twentieth Century life history in the
United States in order to determine who that person really was in a life-long way should ordinarily be easy for a designated
United States official to do. Oddly enough, when it came to the high-level controversy over Mrs. Irene Craigmile Bolam's true
life-long identity this never happened, and it is clear anymore, so much was by intention.
speaks for itself that the debate over Amelia Earhart resurfacing in the United States as 'Irene Craigmile' after World War
Two lasted well into the new millennium with no official resolve attained. One might think the Smithsonian
Institution would have wanted to put an end to it. Or Amelia's family.
The realization was
they didn't because they couldn't, for what apparently were long-ago withheld and buried, important reasons.
That is until several years ago, when adjustments to this axiom began taking
place after the profound truth of Amelia Earhart's post-loss continued existence began staring back at people in no uncertain
What became of Amelia Earhart after July 2, 1937 is now known thanks to an extensive
evaluation of decades worth of forensic research done by individuals dedicated to learning the truth; and to the recent-years 'indisputable results' of a long-term forensic comparison
analysis that cleanly proved Amelia Earhart continued to live well beyond the above listed date.
it is forensically undeniable that Amelia Earhart survived her well storied "disappearance." Except in the interest
of avoiding post World War Two discourse about it (and her own future privacy) she ended up resurfacing in the United States
after the war years as a non-public figure with a different name and a new career.
to believe, but true.
It appears evident enough that Amelia Earhart's new post-war
life of anonymity was enabled by a uniquely orchestrated witness protection program achieved under the guise of the
U.S. justice department--in cooperation with Japan's new post-war democratic government.
may be hard for some people to come to terms with, but the two preceding paragraphs do best explain how after Amelia Earhart
was declared "dead in absentia" in January of 1939, during the aftermath of VJ Day the United States, Japan, and
Amelia herself, for reasons only they truly reckoned, determined said '1939 death declaration' was never to change.
Here, to answer the question of why the general public was left in the dark about Amelia's post-loss
reality, one might consider the following quote from the 1982 Pan Am Airways anthology, The Chosen Instrument by Marylin Bender and Selig Altschul: "Numerous investigations
foundered on official silence in Tokyo and Washington, leaving the true fate of Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan an everlasting
Expounding on this, it is clear the majority of people who deeply
studied the subject of the Earhart-Noonan missing persons case, commonly recognized how amid reparation agreements
made between the United States and Japan during the post-VJ Day months, the door was slammed tight on what actually happened
to the duo on and after the date of July 2, 1937, accompanied by the attitude it was concretely to remain that way from that
point on. It is a solid projection as well; General Douglas MacArthur, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, and Japan's Emperor Hirohito
were all instrumental in the initial establishment of this accord, with some omniscient assistance rendered by the Catholic
How It First
If you are not in-step with the incredible
saga of Joseph A. Gervais (1924-2005) that concerned his 1965 encounter with and subsequent pursuit of Mrs. Irene Craigmile
Bolam, it is because it was never conveyed in an easy-to-understand way. Really, I am the first person to do such a thing,
and it took me a long time to be able to.
I first met and came to know Joseph
A. Gervais and his wife, Thelma, in 1996 at their Las Vegas home, courtesy of a long-time Gervais' friend and collaborator,
1993 Lost Star author, Randall Brink. Randall Brink, Joseph A. Gervais and myself all remained friends and collaborators
from that point on, until Joe's passing took place in 2005.
Rest assured, the
important truths about Amelia Earhart presented here have remained unaddressed by the United States Department of Justice--ever
since the occurrence of the 'tip of the Earhart iceberg reality' Joseph A. Gervais discovered and first publicly
surfaced, took place in 1970.
People have said, people have written, and some people still
do say and write that Joseph A. Gervais was crazy to always adhere to his most important determination about Amelia Earhart's
fate--that being--she survived and changed her name. In the past twenty years I have also seen myself called
'crazy' in spoken and written ways for endorsing his viewpoint. Trust knowing, I exist today among the more sane Amelia Earhart
historians on the planet, although this statement does not decry the work of a few other Amelia Earhart historians who came
before me. Randall Brink's knowledge of the subject matter is most formidable, to be sure, and out of respect for the amazing
amount of investigative research his late friend, Joseph A. Gervais did on the subject of who Mrs. Bolam really was, or used
to be, Randall Brink always left the door open to the possibility of it.
The majority of others,
however, proved themselves deficient within the Earhart truth-seeking arena by automatically refuting Joseph A. Gervais'
Amelia became Irene postulation.
In my case, after learning one had never been done before,
I chose to subject it to a forensic analysis, and by doing so gained the self-assurance required to stand-up and say it was 'justifiable'
for Joseph A. Gervais to claim he solved the missing person case of Amelia Earhart those years ago, by way of displaying her
physical body evidence in a nationally publicized way.
Looking back at it,
the all-but instant dismissal of the 1970 Gervais' assertion about Amelia's post-loss existence as Irene, caused the general
public to miss how important his declaration was those decades ago, and its aftermath left people missing how important it
should have remained in the years that followed. Anymore it is certain, though, the bell-of-truth that Joseph A. Gervais rang
by way of the clear 35MM color photograph he took of the former Amelia Earhart in 1965--that was widely published in 1970--proved
itself impossible to un-ring. It can be said, two years after Abraham Zapruder inadvertently filmed the killing of President
John F. Kennedy, Joseph A. Gervais inadvertendly photographed the rebirth of Amelia Earhart, all-be-her after she had been
renamed "Irene Craigmile" two decades earlier.
have tried to un-ring this long subdued bell-of-truth over the years, but they couldn't do it. In today's world one cannot
easily hide or disguise a corpus delicti [i.e. 'body evidence'] nor is it easy for anyone to justifiably claim that
a person's body, dead or alive, isn't what it naturally evidences (or evidenced) itself to be.
not convinced? Then here's a challenge for you: At the top of this page, take a look at the same 35MM medium close-up color
photograph Joseph A. Gervais took of Mrs. Irene Craigmile Bolam in 1965, and then try to locate any clear photos of the
same woman from prior to the mid-1940s. You will not be able to do it because photos of her do not exist from prior to
the mid-1940s, unless of course, the same Mrs. Bolam displayed in it appears as her former self, 'Amelia Earhart'
It is also interesting
to note how all the while, on record, not one official United States historian ever expressed a certain opinion
toward the belief Joseph A. Gervais maintained the last forty years of his life. Basically, on any official level
his 'Amelia became Irene' assertion was perpetually met by official history deflections, or avoided entirely.
here it is. Brace yourself, because you're about to learn the truth about what became of Amelia Earhart after July 2, 1937,
and the way it happened.
No, Amelia did not disappear. People don't do that. She also
did not continue to fly around aimlessly in radio-silence after missing Howland Island until her plane ran out of gas, thus
causing it to crash and sink into the ocean. She and Fred Noonan were a lot smarter than that. Rest assured as well, Japan's
military never put them in front of a firing squad, and their bodies were never eaten by giant crabs on the desert island
Ladies and gentlemen, at long-last, it is finally
time to 'get real' about Amelia Earhart.
In the summer of 1965, at a gathering of mostly retired, all
be them highly respected pilots in New York, a former air force captain who had flown planes in World War Two, Korea, and
Vietnam met and believed he recognized the woman who used to be known as Amelia Earhart. The man was Joseph A. Gervais, and
after deeply studying the woman's background for the next five years, he ascertained his belief about her was correct, and
surfaced his realization to a national news level in 1970.
deduction was well founded, but Joe Gervais underestimated the power of the long-withheld truth he discovered. Back then,
one didn't just call out the still-living, 'identity cloaked' Amelia Earhart.
As things went, desiring
to continue with the privacy she had sought and coveted for herself after the World War Two years, and for what she considered
to be historically prudent reasons as well, the former Amelia Earhart denied the assertion Joe Gervais made about her. Except
the controversy over who she really was, or used to be, never went away, even after she died in 1982, and then into the new
millennium. Consider this again as well; in 2015, fifty years after Joe Gervais met and photographed Mrs. Bolam, many people
were still wondering who she really was, or used to be, because no person or entity had ever 'officially' put an
end to the debate over her true identity.
After commencing with it in 1997, my
'Protecting Earhart' long-term forensic comparison analysis that was designed to determine if the decades-old Gervais' assertion
about the woman was or wasn't correct, proved that it was correct. World academia is just now starting to catch up to this
newfound historical reality. The stately looking, wings-adorned elder woman featured in the photograph above, shown in her
true eightieth year, definitely did used to be known as Amelia Earhart.
It is hard to blame
doubters for there is so much to know about this story, foremost to include how over the years there have been well meaning
people 'in the know about it' who preferred the general public not pay attention to the truth about Amelia Earhart's world-flight
outcome, for what they as well believed to be prudent historical reasons.
For years these people remained legion and to a certain extent their historical preference
about Amelia is still being honored today. It is plain enough a kind of high level, post-World War Two pact involving
the United States and Japan steered the veracity of what actually happened to Amelia Earhart in 1937 away from being publicly
recognized and accepted. The only hiccups along the way were the 1960s investigation efforts of Joe Gervais and Fred Goerner,
followed by Gervais' 1970 assertion about 'Mrs. Irene Bolam' that became a national news item. When the story of his incredible
proclamation broke, though, the mere notion of Amelia Earhart's ongoing name-changed existence seemed just too unbelievable
on the surface, abetting all naysayers.
No matter; the realities
the forensic study revealed in the last twenty years left a caveat that exposed the underbelly truth of Amelia's post-loss
existence as 'Irene,' and the 'Protecting Earhart' website, Irene-Amelia.com features a good sampling of younger-to-older
superimposed photographs displaying Amelia Earhart prior to 1938 as compared to her later-life self.
Love her unconditionally, because ready or not, the woman famously
known as Amelia Earhart in the United States more than eighty years ago... is finally coming home, as 'Irene.'
End Part I
Part II begins after the following images and explanatory
Above on the far left, shown in a 1965
photo taken in Cocoa Beach, Florida, is the same Mrs. Irene Craigmile Bolam who was photographed that same year in New York
by Joseph A. Gervais.
Setting the record straight: It wasn't until the new millennium arrived that the forensic analysis displayed
the face prints, head sizes, necks, shoulders, arm lengths, hands, heights, foot sizes, handwriting, and voice resonances
to all be congruent within the Amelia-to-Irene comparisons. Not to omit how friends, relatives, and locations frequented displayed
their own before and after alignments. As well, the Irene Bolam who Joseph A. Gervais met and photographed in 1965 appeared
nowhere as 'Irene' prior to the mid-1940s. Here, Tod Swindell's forensic analysis displayed the reality of there having been
three different Twentieth Century women attributed to the same "Irene Craigmile Bolam" identity, and how
one of them, the 1965 Joseph A. Gervais photographed Irene was previously known as Amelia Earhart.
Above are the three different Twentieth Century
women who were historically identified as one in the same, "Irene Madeline O'Crowley Craigmile Heller Bolam."
Amelia Earhart's extended family and the Smithsonian Institution made a habit of encouraging the public to not take seriously
or dismiss out of hand what was first publicly asserted about Mrs. Irene Craigmile Bolam by Joseph A. Gervais in the
1960s. This could be due to the historical convenience of not wanting to alter pop culture's status-quo viewpoint about Amelia
Earhart it has long maintained toward her heroic legacy and the so-called "mystery" of her disappearance. Anymore
however, the observable forensic reality of Amelia Earhart living well beyond the World War Two era in the United
States after assuming another identity... has segued into existing today as an obvious, albeit 'subcultural' historical true-hood.
|The Gervais-Irene Bolam
|Newspaper photo, as 'Mrs. Irene Bolam' in Japan, 1963
|Amelia photo added
|Superimposed reveals her earlier and later self-images
|Photo from after the Friendship flight
"Special recognition goes to Tod Swindell,
who undertook an extensive, in-depth forensic analysis of the Gervais-Irene Bolam and Amelia Earhart to show the world
they were one in the same person." USAF Colonel, Rollin C. Reineck, reprinted from the Preface of his 2004 book, Amelia
My late friend, USAF Colonel Rollin C. Reineck, included the above supportive words in his book after he evaluated my forensic
research that unravelled the 'Amelia became Irene' truth, the origin of which stemmed from Joe Gervais and author, Joe Klaas,
who originally introduced the postulation of Amelia's continued survival as 'Irene' in their 1970 book, Amelia Earhart
Lives. After I commenced with my study in 1997, Colonel Reineck recognized how important the realization was of a serious
forensic analysis never having been done before, that compared the highly enigmatic, Irene Bolam to Amelia Earhart. I was
inspired to do one after the odd controversy over Mrs. Bolam was somewhat rejuvenated in 1994 by way of Randall Brink's ground-shaking
expose', Lost Star: The Search For Amelia Earhart. Today, only Randall and I remain, and both of us are greatly indebted
to the magnanimous efforts of the researchers that sided with Joe Gervais, mostly World War Two heroes, whose efforts preceded
our own. Thanks to them, it is now easy to identify how three different women were attributed to the same 'Irene Craigmile
Bolam' identity in the Twentieth Century, with one of them having been previously known as 'Amelia Earhart.' Tod Swindell,
Below: About The 1970 Book, Amelia Earhart Lives By Joe Klaas
is the book that started it all, Amelia Earhart Lives. Although it was chocked with some far-out suppositions in its
attempt to explain what happened to Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan in 1937, it did manage to feature the 1965 photograph of
the former Amelia Earhart when she was known as "Mrs. Irene Craigmile Bolam," taken by Joseph A. Gervais
when the two met each other.
Following the book's release it ended up being ceaselessly
ridiculed after the former Amelia Earhart strongly negated it, no doubt for her own good reasons. Fortunately for her, many
people who looked at the 1965 Gervais taken photograph had a hard time seeing through to who she used to be. She did look
different, but she was still there, and she is still there and always will be there. The forensic tale-of-the-tape proved
it out. Once the bell-ring of the photo's inclusion in the book took place, nothing could un-ring it. World War Two hero,
Joseph A. Gervais always knew this, and he never stopped repeating it to others to his dying day in 2005.
|Based on the research findings of Joe Gervais...
|'Amelia Earhart Lives' by Joe klaas. Published by McGraw-Hill, November 1970
|The Gervais-Irene and Guy Bolam
|From the 1970 book, 'Amelia Earhart Lives' by Joe Klaas
|Amelia Earhart, 1937
| The Gervais-Irene Bolam
|August 8, 1965
|...superimposed shows the obvious congruence...
About What Became Of Amelia Earhart After July 2, 1937
A Two Part Dissertation By Tod Swindell
When Joseph A. Gervais met Mrs. Bolam and her English husband,
Guy in 1965, he was introduced to them by Viola Gentry, a good pilot-friend of Amelia's in the 1930s. Viola had asked Joe
to come to New York and lecture to her club of pilot friends about the previous years of research he had done on Amelia Earhart's
Viola appeared surprised when Mrs. Bolam showed up at the luncheon
where Joe Gervais was to lecture. Somewhat flustered himself, Joe noticed an 'air of importance' about Mrs. Bolam, beyond
feeling that he recognized her for who she used to be. After asking Viola to introduce him to her, Joe cautiously asked Mrs.
Bolam if she ever knew Amelia Earhart? She replied to him that she had 'known Amelia Earhart well' and that she had 'often flown with her.'
He asked if she would be willing to meet him again and she said 'yes' and gave him her business card that listed her name
as 'Irene Craigmile' on it. That had been her name before she married Guy Bolam in 1958.
It turned out, a woman by the name of 'Irene Craigmile' did know Amelia Earhart in the 1930s. Born
Irene O'Crowley to Richard Joseph O'Crowley and his wife, Bridget Doyle O'Crowley, she was mostly raised by her maternal and
paternal extended families. She became Irene Craigmile in 1927, when she married Charles Craigmile, a civil engineer from
Below: The original Irene Craigmile, 1930
Shown between her husband, Charles "James"
Craigmile, and her father, Richard Joseph "Joe" O'Crowley
Craigmile tragically died in 1931. The following year, just a few months after Amelia became the first woman to fly solo
across the Atlantic, the Akron Beacon Journal of Ohio published a photograph displaying both Amelia Earhart and the recently
widowed, Irene Craigmile within it. The two were shown among a group of women aviators visiting the hospitalized pilot, Louise
|The Akron Beacon Journal, September 1, 1932
Above: Amelia Earhart outlined in white, Irene
Craigmile outlined in black.
Above: 'Irene Craigmile' is listed after Viola Gentry
Above: After Amelia married George Putnam in 1931, for a short while
she took his name, as shown here
|A true photo enlargement nearly obliterates...
|...Irene Craigmile between pilots Viola Gentry and Edith Foltz
More about the Original Irene Craigmile
When the above newspaper
photograph was taken, the recently widowed, Irene Craigmile was not-yet a licensed pilot. She began taking flying lessons
in the fall of 1932, after Amelia and Viola Gentry helped sign her up at Floyd Bennet Field on Long Island. She learned
to fly there and at Roosevelt Field until she earned her pilot's license in late May of 1933. Except while she was earning
it, she realized she was pregnant with her last flight instructor, Alvin Heller's child. The two eloped to be married that
August, and later
their son, Clarence Alvin 'Larry' Heller was born in early March of 1934.
Before she realized she was pregnant in 1933, the original
Irene Craigmile had barely logged any solo-piloting hours. She barely ever flew again, and failed to renew her pilot's license
From there the trail of the original Irene grows cold. Clear, legible photographs of her no longer exist,
and it is hard to know what ultimately became of her, beyond a later life friend of Mrs. Irene Bolam's, Diana Dawes, in 1992
offering her awareness that the original Irene 'died' at some point and the announcement of it was withheld, thus enabling
Amelia to continue on with her still extant identity. Only sketchy records remain of the original Irene, including how her
marriage to Alvin Heller, who had relocated alone to Buffalo, New York in the mid-1930s, was legally annulled 'by long distance'
at the end of the 1930s. There was also a child custody battle Al Heller did not win.
Al and the original Irene's son, Larry Heller, grew up to
become a Pan Am pilot and resides in Florida today, but it is evident he never really knew his biological mother, the original
Irene Craigmile. Larry Heller did have a mother figure growing up as a child, but who she actually was remains a subject
of debate. She did not look that much like Amelia Earhart, to be sure, and she appeared to be about a generation younger
than she should have been. Take a look:
Left and right: In 2006, and again in writing
in 2014, Clarence Heller, the son of the original Irene Craigmile, positively identified this woman to have been his late
mother in both younger and older forms. He provided the esitmated dates applied to each photo as well. She did not look like
Amelia Earhart, to be sure, she did not used to be known as Amelia Earhart.
This woman shown in younger and older forms,
was identified as "Irene Craigmile" in 1946 on the left, of the People's National Bank of Long Island's Mineola
Branch. On the right she is seen again in 1965, in the picture Joe Gervais took of her after she became known as, "Mrs.
Irene Bolam" by virtue of her 1958 marriage to Guy Bolam of England. She was identified nowhere as 'Irene' prior to the
mid 1940s, even though she was legally attributed to the same identity of Clarence Heller's mother. For the sake of distinguishing
the different Irene's from each other, Protecting Earhart's study labeled this one, "the Gervais-Irene."
Overcoming decades of ridicule and cynicism, any further the truth stands to exist where there is no doubt this particular
Irene Bolam used to be known as Amelia Earhart.
Neither one of the two different Irene Craigmiles
displayed above appeared to resemble the original Irene Craigmile in the grainy photo below. Born in 1904, no clear, distinguishable
photo images of the original Irene Craigmile have ever been located. Even her son, Larry Heller attested he didn't have any
photos of his mother pre-dating the 1940s. This includes family group photos, wedding pictures, school class pictures, or
any other photos.
|The original 'real' Irene, 1930
Once again, add all of the above knowledge to the
fact that the 'Irene Craigmile Bolam' who Joe Gervais met and photographed in 1965, appears nowhere identified as 'Irene'
prior to the mid-1940s.
Let me repeat that: The 'Irene Craigmile Bolam' who Joe Gervais met and photographed in 1965, appears
nowhere identified as 'Irene' prior to the mid-1940s.
leaves a deduction based on logical reasoning supported by forensic evidence: Where the Irene Craigmile Bolam who Joe Gervais photographed
in 1965 appears anywhere prior to the mid-1940s, she does so identified as 'Amelia Earhart.'
[Forensic Evidence: "That suitable for argumentation
in a court of law."]
About the Original Irene Craigmile's O'Crowley
As the story goes, the original Irene Craigmile's mother, Bridget nee-Doyle O'Crowley,
died in 1917 when her only child, Irene, was twelve. Before Bridget died, census records revealed she had been raising her
daughter alone with her parents in New Jersey. After Bridget died, from that point on census records show Irene being further
raised by her father's family, most specifically by her father's sister, an attorney by the name of Irene Rutherford O'Crowley
who lived with her mother, Sarah, in Newark, New Jersey. [Note: Protecting Earhart's MSS includes a detail of the
O'Crowley family lineage and life events. The O'Crowleys had been a prominent New Jersey family.]
How Amelia Earhart Was Able To Become Irene
Amelia Earhart was a good friend of the original Irene Craigmile's aunt, the attorney, Irene Rutherford
O'Crowley who practiced law in New Jersey and New York. Amelia's former flying pal, Viola Gentry, who introduced Joe Gervais
to the former Amelia Earhart and her husband, Guy Bolam in 1965, later told him this was how Amelia originally came to 'know'
Irene Craigmile, through Irene's attorney-aunt who had been Amelia's friend and a fellow ZONTA organization member with her
The ZONTA organization,
founded in Buffalo, New York in 1919, was and still is an international organization of professional women. Amelia joined
ZONTA after she became famous in 1928, and was soon befriended by two of its more prominent members, Nina Broderick Price
of England, and Attorney Irene Rutherford O'Crowley of Newark, New Jersey, the original Irene Craigmile's aunt.
Nina Price and Attorney
Irene O'Crowley were very good friends and ZONTA chapter presidents who had helped launch the Amelia Earhart brand products
line in the early to mid-1930s. Nina was a flamboyant publicist and dress designer who helped Amelia in those areas, and Attorney
Irene worked on the legal contracts side that helped to establish the Amelia Earhart brand luggage-line based in Newark, something
she continued to be involved with into the 1960s.
Today the ZONTA's still award Amelia Earhart Scholarships to aspiring young
How And When The Amelia-To-Irene Change Took Place
It appears evident enough how at some point during the World
War Two years, Attorney Irene Rutherford O'Crowley cooperated with the U.S. justice department and one Monsignor James Francis
Kelley of Rumson, New Jersey, with an arrangement for Amelia to be able to assume the still-extant identity value of Attorney
Irene's niece, Irene Craigmile for Amelia to use after the war years.
Monsignor Kelley was the president of Seton Hall College
at the time the war ended, and he helped Amelia become the new Irene Craigmile after her return to the United States,
and he served, as he later described it, as her "emotional healing therapist" while doing so. [Monsignor Kelley
held doctoral degrees in psychology and philosophy.]
From the 1970s into the 1990s, Monsignor Kelley explained facets of this incredible
truth he knew to a variety of different people, and a few of them later went on record describing what he had told them.
In 1991, five years before he died, Monsignor Kelley himself confirmed his past long-time friend, the late Irene Bolam,
used to be known as Amelia Earhart in a recorded interview. This did not become public information until the new millennium
arrived, and people who had a hard time believing his conveyance claimed later-life 'senility' must have caused him to make
up the things he said about his late friend, Irene having been previously known as Amelia Earhart. Those who he spoke to
about it, though, insisted he was lucid while doing so, and the forensic analysis itself later revealed he had not made
it up at all.
Amelia's Life As Irene
After she became Irene, Amelia was never known to pilot a plane again. She
was given various positions in the banking industry on Long Island after the war until she married Guy Bolam. She became
a ZONTA member again as 'Irene Craigmile' and served as president of the Long Island ZONTA chapter in the 1950s. After she
married Guy Bolam, the two traveled abroad frequently until Guy died in 1970. Through Guy's enterprise, Radio Luxembourg
in Europe, that she became president of herself after Guy died, it can be said the former Amelia Earhart was part of the
same radio station that helped introduce the Beatles to Soviet Russia in the 1960s. She also knew a few NASA astronauts
and "2001: A Space Odyssey" had been a favorite movie of hers.
When Joe Gervais pegged Mrs. Bolam for who she used to be
in 1965, then tried to introduce it by way of the book, Amelia Earhart Lives in 1970, the former Amelia Earhart sued
the publisher of the book, McGraw-Hill, the book's author, Joe Klaas, and she sued Joe Gervais as well, whose assertion
about Mrs. Bolam inspired Joe Klaas to write the book.
It's worth recalling here how in 1965, even though Mrs. Bolam had agreed to
meet again with Joe Gervais, she subsequently proved herself evasive and never did.
Her lawsuit reached the New York Supreme Court and lasted
five years. Mrs. Bolam's Attorney, Benedict Ginsberg, who had once worked for Robert F. Kennedy, sought 1.5 million dollars
in damages. Except Mrs. Bolam, who had not been involved in the book's writing process, did not sue the publisher and authors
for inferring she was the former Amelia Earhart. She sued them for libel. For instance, the book had referred to her late
husband, Guy, (who died the same year the book came out) as her "alleged husband," when in fact they had been legally
ended up remitting a high five-figure settlement to the former Amelia Earhart, and it removed the remaining copies of Amelia
Earhart Lives from the stores. [Author, Joe Klaas, estimated about forty-thousand copies of the book made it into circulation
before it was withdrawn, and it has since been republished.] In an interesting twist as well, she settled her differences
with Joe Gervais and Joe Klaas by way of the opposing parties swapping ten dollars of consideration, after she refused to
submit her fingerprints as proof-positive of her identity. She wasn't in want of money, after all, and after five years
most people had chalked-up the Gervais' assertion about her past as a hoax. It wasn't a hoax, but Mrs. Bolam wasn't about
to wreck the remaining years of her life by way of admitting who she used to be. So much explaining would have been demanded
if she had admitted it, not only from herself, but from a slew of prominent, high-level individuals.
Amelia Earhart died seven years after her 'summary judgment' lawsuit ended. She had prearranged to donate her body to Rutgers
College of Medicine. According to the school when later contacted, she was cremated and interned in a common, unmarked grave.
the time of her death, many people, including some who had been close to her in her later years, continued to suspect Mrs.
Bolam used to be the famous pilot, Amelia Earhart. In a New Jersey newspaper article that appeared a few months after her
passing, even her son's wife, Joan Heller, was quoted to have said she and her husband were "no longer sure" about
the question of her past identity. As well, to myself in 2006, Clarence Heller admitted he held no photos of his mother dated
prior to the 1940s. And although Mr. Heller consistently denied over the years that his mother was Amelia Earhart, he was
merely telling the truth. Clarence Heller was legitimately born to Al and Irene Heller on March 5, 1934.
The bottom line: Anymore
it is absolutely certain that the ongoing suspicion about the late Gervais-Irene Bolam's true past was justifiable, because
it was true that she used to be known as, 'Amelia Earhart.'
There You Have It
So this was and is the true
story of what became of Amelia Earhart after July 2, 1937. Be that as it may, it is still unclear when it comes to what really
happened after she and Fred Noonan were declared 'missing.' It is widely assumed that within days after the duo failed to locate
Howland Island, Japan rescued them in the lower Marshall Islands where they had endured an emergency ditching.
The later added deducement that featured Amelia's continued survival, states that right when Japan was about
to declare war on China, she and Noonan strayed too far north during their Plan-B attempt to reach the Gilbert Islands, and
they ended up in Japan's off-limits Marshall Islands instead. There they were picked up and detained, and at least Amelia
ended up remaining in Japan's custody until the end of World War Two.
various aspects of the above descriptions have been corroborated by different Amelia Earhart historians over the years, to
explain why Amelia's Marshall Islands ditching is still an assumption today is academic: The only official record
of Amelia's loss shows that she went missing on July 2, 1937, and after not being found she was legally declared 'dead' in
early January of 1939.
Therefore, technically, where the July 2, 1937 Marshall Islands ditching assertion
still remains an assumption, within the constraints of it, to go along with Amelia's body evidence showing up as Irene Craigmile
eight years later in the United States, what really happened to her on that July 2, 1937 day, supplemented by where she ended
up later, how she was treated, and how she spent her days while she was gone... anymore exists as the 'real' mystery of Amelia
Earhart. Take heart in knowing, it is safe to believe the former Amelia Earhart took much of the answers
to those questions to her grave with her.
Today, all we really know for certain in a forensic reality way, is that
several years after Amelia Earhart went missing she managed to surface in the United States as Irene Craigmile, and she worked
in the banking industry known by that name until she married Guy Bolam of England in 1958, and the general public was never
supposed to know who she used to be, even after she died in 1982.
Believe it or not, it's that simple.
|...superimposed shows the obvious congruence...
|...to the Gervais-Irene Bolam in 1965
Note: The above human congruence does not exhibit
a doppelganger-like coincidence. Head-to-toe and character trait wise, my forensic analysis that compared the Mrs. Irene Craigmile
Bolam who Joseph A. Gervais met and photographed in 1965 to Amelia Earhart, merely displays the same human being in younger
and older forms. Her birth name was "Amelia Mary Earhart." She was born in Atchison, Kansas on July 24, 1897, and
she died on July 7, 1982 in Edison, New Jersey, then known as "Irene Craigmile Bolam." Her father was "Samuel
Stanton 'Edwin' Earhart," who was born in Atchison, Kansas, in 1867, and who died in Los Angeles, California in 1930.
Her mother was "Amelia Otis Earhart" who was born in Atchison, Kansas in 1869, and who died in Medford, Massachusetts
in 1962. Her sister and only sibling was "Grace Muriel Earhart Morrissey" who was born in Kansas City, Kansas on
December 29, 1899, and who died in Medford, Massachusetts on March 2, 1998.
Amelia's sister, Grace Muriel Earhart Morrissey, was also
a ZONTA member who did know her sister, Amelia in her later life years as 'Irene,' although she never openly acknowledged
her awareness of past as 'Amelia.' She was also known to admonish anyone who suggested her ZONTA friend, Mrs. Irene Craigmile
Bolam was actually her sister going by a different name, and it steadfastly remained that way until her passing in 1998. Her
daughter, Amy carries on the same tradition today.
When Joseph A. Gervais and his wife, Thelma met with Muriel in 1967, and suggested
to her the idea that Amelia was still alive but going by a different name, Muriel replied to him, "Even if that were
true, Major Gervais, wouldn't it be best to leave it alone?"
Food for thought.
Tod Swindell, 2018
Once a world-famous pilot...
...the former Amelia Earhart